Pro-Life Abortion is unethical and immoral.

Publicity for “The Silent Scream” was provided by no less a figure than President Ronald Reagan, who showed the film in the White House and touted it in speeches. Like Nathanson, Reagan, who had signed one of the first abortion-legalization bills when he was Governor of California, was a zealous convert to the pro-life cause. During his term as president, Reagan wrote and published a powerful pro-life book entitled Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation—a book that Nathanson praised for telling the truth about the life of the child in the womb and the injustice of abortion.

Essays | Abortion Rights Are Pro-Life

Abortion is a pretty cut and dry topic; you are either Pro-Life or Pro-Choice.

Free Argumentative Essay on Abortion, Pro-life | …

First, abortion is always a bad thing because it does end a unique,particular life or a very near, potential life; yet it may not be the wrongthing, since it may be the best alternative of a bunch of bad alternatives,or it may be the result of a right that overrides a greater good. Someright actions in life are those which involve bad things, for example whensomeone has to have their leg amputated in order to save their life, orwhen someone has to have prolonged and painful treatment to prevent rabieswhen the dog who bit them cannot be found. A bad option can be the rightoption to choose in making a decision if it (1) is based on a right thatoverrides other actions or if it (2) is the best option open to the agentwho will perform the action and is an option that does not violate someoverriding right. An example concerning such an overriding right, usuallygiven in ethics classes, is the right of an innocent person not to be punishedfor a crime authorities know he did not commit but could frame him forto the public, just in order to deter future potential criminals, evenif that were to save countless future victims. Innocent people have a rightnot to be punished just to serve as an example of what would happen toa person guilty of a particular kind of crime, regardless of how much betterconditions would be if some innocent person was occasionally punished,or even executed, that way. Hence, with regard to abortion, abortion ofa fetus (which leads to its death) may be right if it is the best of abunch of bad alternatives available, or if there is some overriding reasonor some other right which overrides the fetal right to life, as in thecase where the mother's life is in jeopardy if she carries the child longenough for it to be viable (i.e., the mother's right of self-defense).Likewise abortion would be wrong if it is not the best alternative and/orif the fetus has a right to life overriding alternatives even though thosealternatives may make others better off in the long run. So the questioncomes to whether there are better alternatives than termination of thefetus or not, and whether in different cases there are rights which overridethe best alternatives -- either on behalf of the fetus when terminationgives the better situation for others, or on behalf of others when non-terminationgives the better situation for the fetus and/or those other than the geneticparent(s).

Free Pro-Life Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe

Second, each embryo is a particular individual that has the potentialto become, in a relatively short time, a particular person. Conceptionis a rather miraculous, complex event (even, and perhaps especially, ifone understands it scientifically) and it seems to me that, at the veryleast, unnecessary, unjustified abortion is in some sense insensitivelywasteful, and unappreciative of the event and of the value of each particularindividual character that is already, by virtue of conception, partly alongthe path to becoming a particular person. Life, because it can be good,is not something to squander needlessly or take for granted. And to endthe already beginning development of a particular individual that can neverbe recreated is not something to take lightly even though that individualmay not yet have attained the consciousness to be aware of its own end.(Even in adults, it is not the self-awareness of one's own dying that isthe worst thing about death; it is not even always a bad thing about deathif it allows one to "come to terms" with one's own death. It is the lossof potential for good, particularly for good that has been, in a sense,earned by the individual's struggle toward development and maturity, and/orfor potential good that seems very likely to occur, given a particularperson's gifts and promise.It is hardly a defense against homicide or a satisfying diminution of itstragedy that one killed an innocent and good person instantly while thatperson was asleep or unconscious or in a way that "he never knew what hithim". Similarly, the fact that a relatively young person dies of naturalcauses painlessly and without warning may lessen the tragedy of such anevent relative to his dying in a more traumatic way, but it does not keepthe death from being a tragic loss).

Pro-life and pro-choice advocates beliefs on abortion differs morally, lawfully and ethically.
Others are Pro Life, and say that abortion is unethical and is considered as a form of homicide.

Persuasive Essay: Pro-Choice Abortion | b3ccadee

So abortion should not be considered as the only way to get out of a pregnancy because the woman could get breast cancer after the abortion process is over, the person may experience psychological damage due to aborting the child, and the woman is ending a human life. The first reason abortions should not be allowed is because the woman could get breast cancer after having the abortion....

Pro-Life supporters believe that it should be illegal to abort and preformed.

Abortion: Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Essays

When it comes to abortion there are two complex opposing groups, pro-lifers and pro-choicers, each group think that their position is the right position.

“Pro-Choice”, pro-life being against and pro-choice supporting abortions.

Essay on Pro-Choice Abortion - 1374 Words | Bartleby

I am simply interested in this paper in the moral arguments about abortionwithout regard to whether they might also support some particular Scripturalinterpretations or not. This paper will deal, not with unsubstantiatedand unargued, non-reasoned claims for ethical principles based on authority,but with evidence that is given either for abortions in certain cases oragainst them in others, evidence that is meant to be logical and also compassionateand understanding. Such a method is not infallible, but the mistakes itengenders are at least correctable by use of the method itself. Logic isalways open to other logical rebuttal; and compassion is always open tocompassion that encompasses more correct understanding. The nature of arational, intelligent, compassionate ethical discussion gives the hopethat if error of either sort is made, it can be discovered and correctedby further thought, understanding of experience, and discussion. Presentpolitical and judicial rhetoric and decisions do not give me that hope.I am also not given that hope by some seemingly entrenched, unreflective,and irrationally dogmatic religious views or by some of the equally unreflectiveand irrationally dogmatic supposedly "liberal" or "modern" views. Neitherthe total "pro-life" nor the total "pro-choice" side seems to me to havea monopoly on the right or even on being reasonable on this issue. In thispaper I also wish to point out the lack of merit, and sometimes even thetotal lack of relevance, of some of the more politically popular or well-publicizedarguments on both sides of the abortion issue. I think there are betterand more relevant considerations that can shed more light on the subject.