How to Write a Critical Evaluation Essay

The value of worker innovations is material, and CHC tried to show howthe contradictory nature of capitalism rewarded both adherence to and variationfrom the norms (both standardization and differentiation). Thatobservation works not only for the system but also for the individual operatingwithin Hollywood. Both economic and stylistic analysis points toa bounded set of options that have flexibility to change. Such anobservation is not one solely available to scholars. People working withinthe industry may witness it operating. I stressed in my evaluationof the Hollywood mode of production that an ideological attitude about authorshiphad permeated the industry by the 1930s (CHC, 336). It isscarcely a grand observation to note that discourses resembling early forms ofauteurism appear in industry and educational venues; D. W. Griffith even putout ads in trade papers in the early teens claiming he invented various stylisticpractices (see ).Thus, promoting one’s self has been, throughout the history of Hollywood,part of labor practices. Analyzingauthorship as a determined and historical agency continues as one of my on-goingresearch agendas.

I might find that some of the essays were drawn out too long, ..

A more thorough set of criteria might be:

Critical essay writing : Skills Hub: University of Sussex

BASIC EVALUATION GUIDELINES
Once you have understood the target journal article (and have ‘Established the facts’), you can use the questions below to begin to think evaluative about the article. You may find some of these questions are more relevant to your essay than others. In addition, your answers to these questions will be starting points in the development of your evaluation. You can, for example, use your answers to help you to identify additional relevant research and theory. You should also read the ‘CSP Coursework Guidance’ document on the VLE.
11. Are the aims of the research clear? Do they rise convincingly from previous research or observation? Have the authors convinced you that the study is worth carrying out? ?
12. If the research is quantitative, how are the variables operationalized? Is there a good argument for the validity of the operationalization? ?
13. Is the hypothesis (if there is one) clear? If there is no hypothesis, is the purpose of the paper clear? ?
14. Is the design appropriate for the purposes of the research? ?
15. Do the authors give sound practical or theoretical reasons for all their design ?decisions? ?
16. Could you, in principle, make a reasonable stab at replicating this ?investigation using the information provided? ?
17. Is the sample appropriate? To what extent can we generalise from it? ?
18. Are the results clearly presented? ?
19. Have the authors used appropriate statistical tests? Do they report missing ?data or outliers and say how these were dealt with? ?
20. Is it obvious how the research questions or hypothesis/es are being answered ?by the results? ?
21. How do the authors interpret their results? Are the authors’ claims supported ?by the actual data? ?
22. Are there any new or unexpected findings? If so, are they presented as a ?coherent part of the story? ?
23. Does the research come together as a unitary whole? Does the discussion ?refer back to the issues identified in the introduction? ?
24. Have the authors done what they set out to do? ?
25. What leads for future research does the paper give? Are these sensible in the ?light of their findings? ?
26. What is the value of the research? Does it answer an important question or ?does it seem trivial? Has it contributed to our understanding of the subject ?area? ?
27. Look back at the title and abstract. Do they give an accurate account of what ?you have just read? ?

So set out your plan for the essay at the outset and then use ..

When I came onto the project in the late 1970s, also influentialfor me were Marxism and the ideological critique of romantic authorship sincethese theories assumed a historical materialist base. This philosophicalposition was much more credible to explain history and historical change. Italso fit with my biography as a working-class daughter who was a first-generationcollege student. Itmatched my political progressivism. Turning to an eclectic group of Marxisttheorists—Harry Braverman, Raymond Williams, Jean-Louis Comolli, John Ellis,Louis Althusser, and other analyses of modes of production—I looked for(and found) valuable explanations about how and why labor divided and constructedsystems of bureaucracy and work patterns to insure both the standardization anddifferentiation of an entertainment product. One of the points that I stressedwas that “what was occurring was not a result of a Zeitgeist orimmaterial forces. The sites of the distribution of these practices werematerial: labor, professional, and trade associations, advertising materials,handbooks, film reviews” (CHC, 89). Although I had not beenreading contemporaneous structural-functionalist production of culture literatureby Howard Becker, Paul DiMaggio, Paul Hirsch, Richard A. Peterson, and others,similar general issues permeated both sets of literature even if the theoreticalexplanations differed.

other people's writing - question it, adopt a critical ..
strictly to the helpful guidelines set out ..

Coursework: Critical Evaluation Essay

stance as you would in the average academic essay when writing an evaluation

Writing a Critical Review | UNSW Current Students

Coursework: Critical Evaluation Essay The coursework component for this module is a 1000-word essay

References need to be set out APA ..