Need to take off the "e" after the integrity,
@ Dr. I. Needtob Athe [destination missing]
Be that from criminal hackers seeking to profit from direct sales or other usage of private information, or be it from criminal bureaucrats wanting to surmount tyrannical control.
CRASH..." rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
Privacy is also but one aspect of security. Really, if you want to know ultimately what the "privacy concerns" are all about, it is really about maintaining personal rights and powers and keeping those from getting stripped.
Drone sales skyrocketed this Christmas.
Stuxnet is an "attack" method. I'm talking of "defense" mechanisms. Your idea maybe "patentable" given that you put more specifics that show clear innovation beyond what's obvious to those "skilled in the art". "Random", "dongle", ... aren't new. The way you construct and utilize them maybe novel.
Not the biggest deal, sure. The best only last thirty minutes.
As I've said before, I'm sure the Stuxnet designers did, because most if not all of the interesting supposasly new stuff Stuxnet used had been described long before on this blog...
But, as SO much increasingly relies on GPS, how can that happen?
By and large you are right about the inevitability of driverless cars/ smart roads in the not too distant, if not exactly future. That said, @ albert is plainly wrong imagining that smart roads will ("”). All such traffic will have to be redirected to its own parallelized road network.