Nuclear Energy Abuses And Uses Free Essays - …

Muslim front organizations of the Muslim Brotherhood and otherterrorist organizations have co-opted many a rabbinical group,especially those groups that are committed to trendy social andhumanitarian causes, disregarding their obligation to safeguard"the religious and national integrity of the Jewish people."Matthew Hausman discusses one such situation, where the Muslimgroup CAIR, an anti-Jewish group committed to advancing sharia lawin the West, persuaded rabbis to act as their agents insuppressing a synagogue discussion on radical Islam, whenknowledge of Muslim tactics is very important to maintaining thesecurity of the Jewish community. How do we explain rabbis whoworry about Muslim (an important word in thevocabulary of PC) when what is needed is "Jewish assertiveness,support for Israel, and criticism of radical Islam"?Hausman includes an interestingdiscussion of how the Diaspora mentality, strong during theRoosevelt presidency, continues to encourage "self-rejection andidentification with hostile critics."

Free Essays on Uses And Abuses Of Nuclear Energy …

Free Essays on Uses And Abuses Of Nuclear Energy. Get help with your writing. 1 through 30

Essay On Uses And Abuses Of Nuclear Energy - Justin …

Iraqi children were still dying by the thousands, our government would look for another opportunity to bomb Iraq, and they had learned their lesson. The next time they moved to bomb Iraq, even the appearance of a democratic consensus being achieved with the public would not be risked. Our government would likely stage no more "town meetings" before they bomb somebody. The December 1998 bombing of Iraq validated my suspicion. That one had no warning or propaganda buildup. It happened on the day that Clinton was impeached. Similarly, the summer before, America bombed Sudan and Afghanistan when the Lewinsky scandal was headline news. With and timing, the movie came out soon before we bombed Sudan and Afghanistan. Did life imitate art again? In the autumn of 1998, the propaganda machine revved up again. The subsequent bombing of Yugoslavia was the same, with no selling of the war to the American people before it began.My motivation for writing letters to the editor was not necessarily being published, but helping to let the newspaper know how many people out there felt like me, and perhaps they might run one letter like mine. If the people truly stand up, they will be counted, but the system is increasingly rigged against people participating in it. Noam Chomsky has written about how the system works for many years in many books. In nearly every society there are an elite few at the hierarchy's top, and they often view those below them as beings to be used for their own selfish ends. The West immediately attacks any nation that attempts to form an egalitarian society, as we think that we own the world, and have for five centuries. Ralph McGehee stated it clearly . Egalitarianism is incompatible with elitism, and USA has long led the field in destroying egalitarian movements worldwide.The coverage of the bombing attacks of 1998 was a much different affair than it was in 1991, or the saber rattling during the winter of 1997-1998. What happened in December 1998 literally made me sick. They impeached Clinton for the wrong crime. That time nearly the entire world was against America. Clinton, with a straight face, told America that the bombs we were dropping in Iraq as he spoke were dropped to protect Iraq's neighbors. Not one of Iraq's "threatened" neighbors voiced approval of the bombing. They all said to stop bombing Iraq. Even nations that supposedly hated Saddam Hussein, such as Syria and Iran, protested what the USA and the UK were doing. They knew that a devastated nation of starving people posed little threat to them, and the writing on the wall was obvious: if they displeased the USA, they could end up just like Iraq. The USA's hypocrisy regarding the UN was laid bare. If America could manipulate the UN into voting our way, we present their vote as authorizing our actions, speaking fair words about the need to obey international law and the UN's voice. When the UN does not vote the way we like, we give them the finger, doing as we please. The fact that we outraged two of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, China and Russia, while France looked for a place to hide, spoke volumes about the USA's actions. The entire world saw that our actions in Iraq benefited nobody but us. Peace activists began saying that dropping a nuclear bomb once a year on Iraq would be more humane than the slow starvation and strangulation of its population.The night of America’s surprise bombing of Iraq on December 16th was not a happy one for me. I decided against writing another letter to the editor, and wrote a several page essay. I was up until about 3:00 AM writing it. I titled it "In the Service of Empire." I had not had a web page up for a couple of years, and had not planned to go public until a book was published. My writings were being published around the Internet in various places, and I was getting more requests for my work. I decided to start another website, putting my latest writings under one roof, which led to this website. The Iraq portion of this essay was the first part of that project. Since our attack on Iraq in December of 1998, there was a continuous series of air battles and skirmishes between the USA and Iraq. The best analysis of events takes into consideration the USA's global political-economic aims and those of its junior partner, the UK.

Essay on uses and abuses of nuclear energy - …

Sprinkle's were published, the ran its weekly Cal Thomas column. Thomas was a nationally syndicated columnist who called himself a Christian from the conservative tradition. In Thomas's column, he also called for dropping nuclear weapons on Iraq, and he was not alone on the national stage with his opinion. Thomas wrote that nuking Iraq would "save lives." He obviously did not mean the lives of Iraqi citizens.What made the sentiments of Thomas and Sprinkle surreal was that the events in Iraq and Kuwait were obviously not a "war" in any meaningful sense. In the words of American soldiers, what happened in Iraq was a "turkey shoot." Iraq was virtually defenseless to America’s record bombing campaign. It was history’s most intense bombing campaign to that time. Nobody will ever know exactly how many Iraqi soldiers died in that "war." Credible estimates range from 100,000 to 200,000 soldiers dying, and even higher. Iraq's elite Republican Guard was not decimated. The dead were mainly Iraqi conscripts. The vast majority never even saw an American soldier before they died. They usually died in their shelters and trenches, huddling from the awesome devastation raining from the air.The USA tried out many new weapons in Iraq. Americans generally only heard about the Patriot Missile system that was used to shoot at Iraqi Scuds. Barely reported was the Iraqi population's suffering, or the neat weapons used on Iraq. Those realities were hidden from the American people. Pentagon censors screened virtually every American news report that came from Iraq. The American people were treated to daily propaganda exercises led by Norman Schwarzkopf, who is now in America's pantheon of heroes. Once in a great while, some truth made it to the public, and it was usually by the and CNN, two non-members of the Eastern Oligarchy. In the on February 24, 1991 John Balzar brought a little reality to his readers with his front page article titled "Apache Copters: Deadly Havoc in the Dark of Night." Balzar was able to watch night vision gunsight footage from the briefing room. He reported what he saw: "They looked like ghostly sheep flushed from a pen - Iraqi infantrymen bewildered and terrified, jarred from sleep and fleeing their bunkers under a hellish fire. One by one, they were cut down by attackers they could not see or understand. Some were blown to bits by bursts of 30-millimeter exploding cannon shells. One man dropped, writhed on the ground, then struggled to his feet; another burst of fire tore him apart…Even hardened soldiers hold their breath as the Iraqi soldiers, as big as football players on the television screen, run with nowhere to hide. These are not bridges exploding or airplane hangers. These are men." The weapons used in the Gulf War were nightmarish. Bombs that explode at waist level were not the kinds of smart bombs that our newscasters oohed and aahed over. By the Pentagon's own numbers, 93% of the bomb tonnage used by America in the Gulf War was not "smart." Missiles that turned around buildings in pursuit of their targets were evening news fare, but the vast majority of what America dropped onto Iraq was the dumb kind, and about 70% of it missed its target. If Americans had seen what was really happening in Iraq, they might not have cheered so loudly.During the Gulf War, some weapons systems deployed were the most powerful weapons short of a nuclear bomb. One was a fuel-air bomb. The bomb works thusly: there are two detonations; the first spreads a fine mist of fuel into the air, turning the area into an explosive mix of vast proportion; then a second detonation ignites the mixture, which causes an awesome explosion. The explosion is about the most powerful "conventional" explosion known. At a pressure shock of up to 200 pounds per square inch ("PSI"), people in its detonation zone are often killed by the sheer compression of the air around them. Human beings can typically withstand up to about a 40-PSI shock. The bomb sucks oxygen out of the air, and can apparently even suck the lungs out through the mouths of people unfortunate enough to be in the detonation zone. Our military used it on helpless people. The USA also dropped a bomb called "Big Blue," with a specialized high-tech explosive mixture that can produce up to a 1,000-PSI shock wave, a magnitude only exceeded by nuclear weapons. That kind of shock wave turns a body into hamburger, even if no shrapnel hits it.Some of the other weapons systems deployed were called "bouncing" bombs. "Adam" was one of those bombs used in the Gulf War. It is euphemistically called an "antipersonnel" bomb. The bomb bounces up to about waist high after hitting the ground, so when it explodes it has a better chance of eviscerating the "personnel" unfortunate enough to be near it. Another novel weapon deployed in the Gulf War was "The Beehive." The Beehive was a bomb that spins at high velocity, spitting out 8,800 pieces of razor-edged shrapnel in all directions, producing a "Swiss-cheese" effect on anybody near it. In concept, those weapons were not exactly new, but were high-tech, refined versions of earlier ideas and weapons, nearly making death-dealing into a macabre art form. As the reporter who wrote about those weapons in 1991 observed: "The mechanics of death and destruction are a grim affair. The military's scientific approach and its philosophies - for example, its preference for wounding vital organs over blowing off limbs - can be deeply disquieting to anybody who imagines such matters are left to chance. Many people would rather not know about the gruesome details." Norman Schwarzkopf never regaled the press with footage showing the results of those weapons.While the bombing was happening, America leapt into a frenzy of jingoistic support. Yellow Ribbon campaigns blanketed the nation. The bank where I worked had a Red, White, and Blue Day at the office, and everybody was supposed to wear those colors and pose for a company group picture. I was working as a temporary employee at the time, and decided to not toe the line, perhaps risking my job. I wore black and green that day and found a way to disappear when the group photo was taken, amidst the chest-beating cheers.

Uses and Abuses of Biochip Technology Essay …

In this essay, Rabbi Pruzansky compares Israel'sirrational entering "into negotiations with an enemy sworn to itsdestruction, when any outcome of those negotiations will redound toits detriment" to the battered wife who can no longer make rationalassessments. "Just like the battered-wife blames herself for theviolence, thinks she can improve the situation by making unilateralchanges, lacks self-esteem, and therefore endures the violence,injury, emotional and verbal abuse and degradation that is her fate —so too Israel. ... Only a country that lacks self-esteem willinglysurrenders its land to its enemies..." A reader, Phil, commented, "Noargument with any of your statements, but if Israel had leaders whowould answer the diplomats pressuring Israel by declaring firmly thatthe Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation, and not one inch ofit is negotiable, I think the pressure would eventually fade, as itsfutility became apparent. Peace negotiations? Sure. Land negotiations?Never. Not one inch. In this regard, Israel's leaders are indeed toblame, for suggesting that Israel will give up anything for even thechance to talk about peace."

The Coming Fall of The House of Windsor

In this essay, Michael Devolin takes on Thomas Friedman, theShimon Peres of journalism. Both Peres and Friedman can sustain alofty tone and the pretense of having carefully examined all thatneeds considering, combined with an impressive ignorance ofconsequences and incompatibilities. In a recent column, Friedmanreassured us that in his pondering on the forthcoming nuclear dealwith Iran, he was considering small details like verification andlarger matters like the "wider American strategic goals in theregion." In Friedman's dream sequence, transforming Iran into acivilized country would take place after Iran and the Saudisplayed out their ancient feud, pummeling each other "until theyget exhausted." Devolin points out a few defects in Friedman'sanalysis. First, if the Sunnis and the Shi'ites have been fightingfrom soon after Mohammad's time, why would Friedman expect them topatch up things before Iran acquires the bomb and misuses its newpower? Iran's incurring a tragic number of deaths during theIran-Iraq war didn't shorten the war. Why would it now? Second, itmay be true that given a resurrection of the U.S. relationship tothe Shah — the one Jimmy Carter ruined — the US mightbe able to use Iran to counterbalance the Sunni forces, but thereis no such relationship now. And Iran's open hatred of America andIsrael is hardly an indication that Iran wants to be our buddy. AsDevolin observes, "untruths and fantasy are today common fare for theWestern journalist."

News: Breaking stories & updates - The Telegraph

Altogether, according to the Jewish Virtual Library (:"Like Iran, at least twelve other Middle Eastern countries haveeither announced plans to explore atomic energy or have signednuclear cooperation agreements: Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Egypt, UAE,Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Syria, Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman(Two other counties - Yemen and Libya - cancelled their nuclearprograms). Each of these countries, like Iran as well, haveexplicitly stated that they are only interested in peaceful usesof nuclear technology. The fear is now that these countries mayfollow the Iranian example and work toward building a nuclear bombto protect themselves in any future nuclear arms race." Thesemostly Sunni countries fear a nuclear Iran, particularly now thatthe US will be obligated by its treaty with Iran to protect Iran'snuclear program from harm.