Can science and the truth withstand the merchants of poison?
Get help on your essay writing today.
Free essays, research papers, term papers, and other writings on literature, science, history, politics, and more
My Climate Change | Issues in Science and Technology
SCIENCE AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS … a new stop in knowledge … ISSUED BY THE SOCIAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION The Main Problem The growing permeation by science of our everyday lives provides a subject for considerable comment and speculation. Whether it be welcomed or decried, whether its constructive or destructive results be stressed, it none the less…
Steve Bannon Unchained: George W
The historicist’s failure to distinguish between scientific laws andtrends is equally destructive of his cause. This failure makes himthink it possible to explain change by discovering trends runningthrough past history, and to anticipate and predict future occurrenceson the basis of such observations. Here Popper points out that thereis a critical difference between a trend and a scientific law, thefailure to observe which is fatal. For a scientific law is universalin form, while a trend can be expressed only as a singular existentialstatement. This logical difference is crucial because unconditionalpredictions, as we have already seen, can be based only uponconditional ones, which themselves must be derived from scientificlaws. Neither conditional nor unconditional predictions can be basedupon trends, because these may change or be reversed with a change inthe conditions which gave rise to them in the first instance. AsPopper puts it, there can be no doubt that “the habit ofconfusing trends with laws, together with the intuitive observation oftrends such as technical progress, inspired the central doctrines of… historicism.” (The Poverty of Historicism,116). Popper does not, of course, dispute the existence of trends, nordoes he deny that the observation of trends can be of practicalutility value—but the essential point is that a trend issomething which itself ultimately stands in need ofscientific explanation, and it cannot therefore function as the frameof reference in terms of which anything else can be scientificallyexplained or predicted.
MacIntyre | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Randolph also read an extract from a prescient 1924 essay by his great-grandfather that highlighted Churchill’s acute awareness of both the creative and destructive potential of science. The essay speculates about with