Top 50 Easy Argumentative Essay Topics for College …
Essays for euthanasia arguments | Pretoria Boys High School
As the above discussion indicates, even an analysis of normativeethical theories doesn't provide a clear answer to what shouldbe done in the case of euthanasia. Normative ethical theoriesprovide no basis for consistent decision making because thereis no consensus of the good. Differences between individual valuehierarchies and lack of agreement on what constitutes "good"means that people can use normative ethical theories to defendwhichever position they choose to take. It is clear that mostof the arguments made either for or against euthanasia are derivedon the basis of normative ethical theories, but that they provideno clear mechanism for determining which decision is best. I willattempt to provide some clearer decision making mechanisms inthe conclusion of this paper.
Essays for euthanasia arguments
It is the support that the courts have given to passive euthanasiathat provides the basis for a second and perhaps the most crucialargument. This is the argument that the passive/active distinctionmade by the courts and the medical profession is invalid, cannotbe made, and in actuality does not exist. If it can be proventhat this distinction is invalid, then all of the rights thatallow for passive euthanasia would then allow active euthanasiaas well. Advocates present a variety of different reasons forwhy the active/passive "bright line" cannot exist.