There are some very strong arguments both for and against abortion.

4) On the issue of trying to decide whether thefetus has a soul or when, or whether it is alive, or a live human beingor when, or whether killing a fetus is murder or not, and if so, when:
this is a question that either is more difficult than the questionof the rightness of abortion, or is impossible to answer because therecan be no answer other than simply one by fiat. It is impossible to discoverwhether a fetus is alive or is a human being or can be murdered becausethere is nothing to discover about either life or fetuses (or fertilizedeggs) that can count for or against whether they coincide or not. We alreadyknow to a great extent in what ways fetuses are like born people and inwhat ways they are different. The question is whether the similaritiesor differences are more relevant. That cannot be answered because the conceptof "alive" and "human being" have never before been either readily appliedto, nor kept from applying to, fetuses in the past and because there arenot clear cut enough definitions already for us to be able to tell whetherthey should apply or not.

In this essay I will examine both sides of the abortion issue.

The pro-choice side has many arguments to support it belief in keeping abortion legal.

Free argument against abortion Essays and Papers

Some gay conservatives would later insist that they had been pushed out of public-intellectual conservatism by what they believed were bigoted Evangelicals—the people a conservative movement needs to attract to overcome the large Democratic voting blocs. A good example might be the argument, through the 1990s and 2000s, against allowing gay and lesbian anti-abortion groups a place in prolife marches and strategy meetings. And there are still portions of the Republican world that suffer no dissent on social issues. Just this year, I was invited to give a small talk on faith at CPAC, the enormous annual conservative convention in Washington—and then disinvited, my time given over to someone safer on the topic of marriage.

Free argument against abortion papers, essays, and research papers.

A couple of decades ago when abortion was illegal, thousands of woman died for attempting to terminate the child’s life themselves or with unprofessional help.

Warren’s arguments for abortion’s possible permissibility are lacking in substance.
The main idea of Thomson’s argument is that abortion is morally permissible.

This essay focuses on the arguments for and against abortion

Now let’s talk about John Lott for a minute. Along with John Whitley, he wrote a paper on abortion and crime. It is so loaded with inaccurate claims, errors and statistical mistakes that I hate to even provide a link to it, but for the sake of completeness you can find it . Virtually nothing in this paper is correct, and it is no coincidence that four years later it remains unpublished. In a letter to the editor at Wall Street Journal, Lott claims that our results are driven by the particular measure of abortions that we used in the first paper. I guess he never bothered to read our in which we show in Table 1 that the results are nearly identical when we use his preferred data source. It is understandable that he could make this argument five years ago, but why would he persist in making it in 2005 when it has been definitively shown to be false? (I’ll let you put on your Freakonomics-thinking-hat and figure out the answer to that last question.) As Lott and Whitley are by now well aware, the statistical results they get in that paper are an artifact of some bizarre choices they made and any reasonable treatment of the data returns our initial results. (Even Ted Joyce, our critic, acknowledges that the basic patterns in the data we report are there, which Lott and Whitley were trying to challenge.)

Let's begin this essay by reading at a true life story of a woman who had an abortion.

Argumentative Essay on Abortion: Pro-Life or Pro …

In such a hypothetical future case -- in which young fetuses removedfrom a genetic mother's body will be able to be saved and allowed to matureeither by machinery or by transplant into a new gestation mother's womb-- genetic mothers will be in a very similar position to that which geneticfathers are now: they will have contributed half the cause of the conceptionand half the genetic character of the baby and the embryo will be ableto mature to birth outside of their body and with no physical burden orhealth risk to them. In regard to determining whether the fetal life shouldbe terminated or not, I suspect the law will treat genetic motherswho give up their embryo to a machine or another woman in similar waysit now treats genetic fathers. That is, I assume that without some strongargument to the contrary, the genetic mother or father will have no rightto terminate the life of an abandoned fetus as long as there is a suitablerecipient gestation mother available or as long as sufficient life-supportsystems are available. (Of course, there may be some question about paymentof whatever medical expenses and fetal-support as well as child support,but I do not wish to get into arguments about responsibility for financingabortions, child support, fetal support, embryo implantations, etc.) Whether,however, present legal treatment of genetic fathers, and similar futuretreatment of genetic mothers whose embryos are removed early is itselfright is another issue, an issue I will discuss later with regard to rights,responsibilities, and emotions concerning child bearing and child rearing.

As Thomson observes, most of the common argument on abortion is to define whether or not a fetus is a person....

Argumentative Essay on Abortion Gosnel Abortion - 1040 Words

In deciding fetal termination, we can not take into account the fetus'views about what it wants, or would want to do, because we have no wayof knowing what that might be. Neither it nor an infant nor an irreversiblycomatose person will probably be sorrowfully aware of his/her own death(if humanely done) or of any denial of his/her reaching his/her desiredgoals. An embryo will not have tasted the apple, nor will it have tastedbitter fruit, nor will it have put in much effort or hard work to achieveanything. Any humanely done abortion will not be causing prolonged painor frustrating its desires nor making it face up to a death it fears orwants not to have. What abortion will do is to end its ability to havea future of good or bad. Infants differ from embryos in that each day theylive they develop more the capacity for achievements, joys, sorrows, self-awareness,fears, etc. Plus they are putting in "work" each day as they grow and asthey assimilate and adapt to the environment. Each day more of ahistory or biography develops and more self-consciousness or self-awarenessdevelops.