New York Bar Exam Prep Course - BARBRI Bar Review
Some jurisdictions have their own, unique . Non-MEE essays tend to cover similar ground, but may include jurisdiction-specific topics. For example, essay subjects include California Civil Procedure, Community Property, Professional Responsibility, California Evidence, Remedies, and Wills and Trusts. Back east, Pennsylvania examinees face the unusual requirement of , along with more typical subjects. (In good news for aspiring New York lawyers, New York will adopt the Uniform Bar Exam, or , in July 2016, thus substituting the MEE for New York essays.)
Pass the CA Bar Exam in 100 Hours - Blake Masters
Although some people say you should do questions from each subject at least once a week (i.e. Constitutional Law questions on Monday, Criminal Law questions on Tuesday, Contracts on Wednesday, etc.), I did my MBE Q's in blocks until about one month before the exam. For example, after Constitutional Law finished in BARBRI, I did Constitutional Law multiple choice questions from BarBri and Kaplan/PMBR. Then I did the same with the next topic. Once all six topics were finished in BARBRI, I then started doing exams to test on all the subjects. I ended up answering over 4,000 multiple choice questions (please note that over 1,000 of these questions did not have answer explanations, so very little time was spent reviewing these answers). For the July 2005 MBE, I finished the AM session 45 minutes early and the PM session 35 minutes early. Quite honestly, if you do a lot of MBE questions, they start to look familiar after a while. However, do not use me as a gauge - most examinees finish the MBE with only a few minutes to spare.
If you are an auditory learner, you can make audio files of MBE questions or your MBE rules. For example, using the MBE questions, I took some of the questions, grouped them by category, and then created an audio cd of the questions with answers to listen to in the car on the way to and from BARBRI. You can create your own cds/mp3s by either using a program to read the text aloud and then use a program such as to record the audio in mp3 format. You can also just read an outline into your microphone and use to record your own voice. You then copy the mp3s onto your device or onto a cd to make an audio cd. My MP3s were mostly old MBEs - the question was read, the a,b,c,d answer options were read, and then the answer was read. I usually had about 30 questions on each CD that I played in my car. I found that listening to these audio cds in your car to and from bar review was helpful because: (1) you are a captive audience and (2) you can study a little less at home because you are studying while commuting. If you are an auditory learner, there are a wide range of mp3 audio files on the .
I also signed up for the Kalpan/PMBR 3-Day Review. For both days, I left after the AM session. While going over the answers was somewhat useful, I felt I would be more productive at home doing multiple choice questions. If you sign up for the review, attend the sessions to see if you get anything out of them. If not, just go home and study on your own. Here is a review outline from someone who attended the July 2005 PMBR review:
From the beginning, my goal was to do very well on the MBE and hope I did well on everything else. As opposed to the essays, the MBE is readily quantifiable. If you do not do well on the MBE, you had better have written spectacular essays, and with the time constraints, that is probably not too likely. As I said earlier, for the MBE, I finished the AM session 45 minutes early and the PM session 35 minutes early. This probably is a result of doing over 4,000 multiple choice questions. For the essays, I finished with less than a minute to spare in the AM and PM. And contrary to what your bar review may tell you, I read each essay question and then started writing my answer immediately (instead of outlining), and I still barely finished on time (and I am a fast test-taker). I never made a list of issues or underlined key phrases (although I never did that in law school either). My inability to organize the essays was apparent in some of my answers. For the Torts question, halfway through the question, I realized I completely missed an issue. I had to write a few paragraphs on it on the next page and then drew an arrow illustrating where it should be inserted in my previously written answer. Needless to say, my answers were occasionally disjointed. I would say 80% of my essay answers came from my and 20% from my subject matter outlines. I remembered a good bit from my although it was never word for word. If I got 4 sentences out of a 7 sentence MASTER paragraph, I was happy. I would say I used MASTER phrases for virtually every issue of every essay (except for one or two topics such as Trusts where I had no clue about the topics and no information in MASTER to regurgitate). My did help for the MBE. In the final two weeks, the outlines and MASTER were the only things I really read. In my opinion, knowing the rules is more useful for the essays then the MBE, but that is where a MASTER essay outline can help (although it is a gambit nonetheless). However, for the MBE, the multiple choice questions are the best way to prepare for the MBE in my opinion. This is because to do good on the MBE, you need to know the nuances of the law. It is not easy to learn the nuances unless you answer a lot of multiple choice questions and understand the right answers. In doing 4,000 multiple choice questions, I came up with over 800 rules to answers I did not know at all, and I could have come up with many more (as I explained earlier, I did not have answer explanations to 1,000+ questions). So basically you should do as many multiple choice questions as possible and understand the right answers. On the July 2005 MBE, I scored a 157 raw score which translates to a 162.1 scaled score. This raw score was better than any test score I had while I did practice exams, and your practice scores are usually a good indicator of your final MBE score.
Course Descriptions - University of Baltimore
NOTE: If you took the exam in a state (e.g. California) that only provides your total score and MBE subscores (meaning no detailed essay/MPT scores), I can provide you with a breakdoen of these percentiles if you complete my Starting in 2017, the scoresheets once again contain percentiles for the MBE sub-scores (this information used to be included on score reports but was removed just prior to NCBE's introduction of Civil Procedure to the MBE). These percentiles tell you how many examinees you did better than nationally for each MBE subject and overall. For example, for the Feb 2017 exam, if your %tile for Civil Procedure is 19.7, it means that you scored better than only 19.7% of examinees nationwide on the 25 graded Civil Procedure MBE questions (out of about 23,000 February 2017 examinees). What these percentiles don't tell you are your raw scores (e.g. that you answered 13/25 of the Civil Procedure MBE questions correctly, meaning 52% correct for Civil Procedure). With this information, you can correlate your exam MBE scores to your practice MBE scores (e.g. if you were getting 70% correct on Civil Procedure questions in practice but 52% correct on the exam, you should find a better source of Civil Procedure MBE practice questions). All information submitted is always treated confidentially.