In this essay you will learn the pros and cons of having an abortion.

Pro-life advocates are people who believe abortion is ethically and morally wrong, and that it is the government’s job to protect all people including the lives of unborn children.

The controversy is divided into “Pro-Choice” and Pro-Life” views.

Abortion is a pretty cut and dry topic; you are either Pro-Life or Pro-Choice.

Pro-Life Abortion is unethical and immoral.

Those that oppose abortions for various reasons are considered pro-life, while those that believe abortion is a woman’s choice are considered pro-choice.

There is the pro-choice and the pro-life.

Although the advocates of abortion claim it can save a mother’s life and prevent prolonged suffering, opponents contend abortion damages the women’s body, physically and psychologically, and that abortion contradicts many religious ethics.

The confrontational topic is divided between the views of pro-life and pro-choice.
Pro-life and pro-choice advocates beliefs on abortion differs morally, lawfully and ethically.

Abortion: Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Essay - 1297 …

Further, it seems to me, that there is much room for improvement inthe quality of life society offers its citizens, and that successful effortsin this direction, to actually improve the quality of life for people insteadof just trying to change their attitude about the existing quality of life,will naturally allow more people to decide life is more worth conceiving,giving birth to, and generally extending. This would be analogous to addingmore water to the glass rather than trying to convince someone to see itas being half full rather than half empty. Some of this may require reallocationof financial resources, but much will simply require the right kind ofleadership (government, media, business, etc.) to channel people's workingfor the good life to more productive goals and efforts. For example, afew years ago, a retirement center was combined in a way with a day carecenter -- almost like an extended family situation, where, with help, olderpeople who wanted to, took care of the children, to the benefit of thechildren and themselves. This was a much better situation for both groupsthan separate facilities, and probably even cost less. Particularly inurban areas, ours is not a close-knit and not a very personally compassionatesociety. Raising charitable contributions is business, and giving to charityis often simply just considered to be one more financial obligation ratherthan a source of joy in personally helping someone else. There are someinstances, such as Big Brothers/Sisters, church, service group, and hospitalvolunteer groups, and little league (soccer, football, baseball, softball,basketball, etc.) coaching where the gift is of time and talent more thanmoney, takes place on a very personal level, and is rewarding for the giveras well as the receiver. But there are many, many more areas of life thatsuch personal assistance and interaction could help raise the quality oflife for everyone and make this the kind of society that more people couldagree makes life a blessing rather than a burden and source of travail.

Pro-Life supporters believe that it should be illegal to abort and preformed.

Abortion - Pro Life vs. Pro Choice Essay - 3265 Words

Similarly, it seems to me that if adoption laws and policies were broadenedso that biological parents could interact in some, perhaps limited, waywith a child they have given up for adoption -- in order to watch the childgrow and/or aid in his/her development -- in the same way a neighbor, friend,aunt, or grandparent could, and with just as limited "rights", giving ababy up for adoption might become a more attractive option, relative toabortion, than it is now. I realize there will be problems with this, butit seems those problems would be preferable to pregnant women's havingto decide between abortion and the present system of giving up a baby foradoption. The fact that many women choose abortion over adoption, eventhough they themselves find abortion a terrible option, seems to me toindicate that adoption, as it now stands must be a really horrendous optionfor a woman to consider. My suspicion is that it has to do with losingall contact with one's living and growing biological child, and that ifthis alone were changed, allowing a child to be adopted by someone else(instead of just "giving it up" for adoption) would be a much better optionthan it is now.

Others are Pro Life, and say that abortion is unethical and is considered as a form of homicide.

Abortion: Pro Choice vs. Pro Life Free Short Essay …

I have already argued that in cases of rape and self defense of themother that medical removal of the fetus is morally allowable if the geneticmother rationally chooses that, even if that leads to the termination ofthe fetal life. I will later discuss such cases pertaining to the hypotheticalfuture state when medical removal need not necessarily terminate the fetallife, because of machine maintenance or fetal transplant. I also thinkthat it would take a strong argument to justify saving a severely deformedfetus since no one conceived such a child intentionally or would advocatedoing so, and since we are talking about deformities that cause great sufferingand/or a bad (worse) death later (after self-awareness occurs and afterthe effort to mature has progressed) and deformities that destroy or severelylimit one's chances for a life of any quality. As I said earlier, no onecan seriously hold that life just by itself is better than no life andthat every baby that could be conceived and born ought to be. There seemsto be at least minimally necessary quality to make creating a baby a goodthing. The question is whether it is more humane to terminate what wouldbe an irredeemably terribly suffering life as early as possible (beforesome amount of self-consciousness, effort at life, and/or hope for thefuture occurs -- more about these later) or to simply let that life playout its natural course. I myself think that though some suffering may beworthwhile in some lives, there can be suffering that can have no justificationwhatsoever. And I think lives which have this kind of suffering with littleor no positive or redeeming value are, prima facie, better off ended asearly as possible, ending the suffering as early as possible, unless thereis some overriding specific circumstance to the contrary (such as knowledgethat a person consciously does not want to die even under these circumstances).To change my mind I would have to see some argument I have not yet seenas to why an innocent baby should be made to suffer in a life that knowsonly unremitting torment. I cannot see how it is at all good or right forlife to be only like some kind of endless punishment or suffering.